Ahh, HankHanky...me thinks you have met aformidable group of "thinking women" here who will brook nomisconceptions, nor accept the least bit of hostility from a posterregardless of his/her intentions.
Haven't seen you called to task so eloquently and with such finality ina long, long time. LOL! My advice would be atactical, but silent, retreat in the self-preserving interests ofdiscretion before valor,as these ladies might really getserious and launch a fullout attack!*chuckle* *chuckle*
We "old timers" can't dazzle them with fancyfootwork because many of them do their research, so theydon't open their mouths and embarassingly insert foot like some of thedays of yore. Plus, this forum does have quite an Europeanconsistuency,which by predilection and custom prefers a morenatural diet that has historically been followed there for a milenniumor more.
There are discussions worth drawing a line in the sand for.Rabbit diet is not one of them. People kept rabbits quitesuccessfully enough prior to the advent of pelleted feed tocategorically reject any other feeding methodology.
Kind of reminds me of the argument from genetically modified food, andhow good it is supposed to be for mankind. I'll reservejudgment on that issue, too,until I taste a G.M.peach that is not mealy, or a tomato that tastes like the JerseyTomatoes of 40 years ago. Sometimes, new is not better, noris it "good" for the consumer, but eases the way formarketing and merchandizing interests.
Given an equal opportunity to choose between a natural diet and apelleted diet, I wonder what the average rabbit's preference wouldbe? Have you any clue?
Buck