tonyshuman
Well-Known Member
It's clear that this discussion is pretty heated, but remember that we're trying to be objective here, not personal. Please don't be offended if someone disagrees with you. Simply asking for more facts is not a personal attack.
As a student in the health sciences, it makes me very worried when people make decisions about their health that are based on irrelevant or false information. I feel it's my duty to share truthful information about these health questions so that everyone can read that info, judge it for themselves, and make a decision that way. For that reason, I recommend that everyone read the FDA link I posted above.
Here's an article from the FDA on H1N1 vaccine safety: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/ucm182290.htm
One on Gardasil safety, which is not really relevant to this debate but I'll post as well:
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/ucm179549.htm
Please consider the sources you get information from. There are many websites that try to sensationalize rare cases simply because creating a feeling of panic increases their website traffic and thus their profits from advertisers. The FDA is a government agency that exists to protect the public from unsafe medication and they work very hard to do so. The climate within the pharmaceutical industry (and I have worked in this industry) is very regulated and everything is documented and reported.
If you read good scientific information produced by the FDA, which exists solely to keep us safe, and still don't want to get the vaccine, that's fine for you, but please remember that if you get the disease, you can spread it. Spreading the disease will only make the worldwide situation worse. Widespread vaccination has made some diseases all but disappear in the US, which protects everyone, including those who don't have the money to get a vaccine or aren't in one of the target age groups.
The problem with most of the popular information about vaccines is that it relies heavily on rare cases or things that could be due to a number of factors in the patient's life. This is because people are all different and will respond differently to a drug. You may be the one in 100,000 that has an adverse reaction, that is true. However, the potential benefits of the H1N1 vaccine--not getting sick and missing work, not spreading the virus farther to extend the worldwide pandemic, not spreading the virus to children who are too young to be vaccinated, not spreading the virus to those who aren't on the recommended vaccination list--are great, and the risks are very low. The probability of a major adverse event is very low.
More info on vaccine safety:
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/ucm133806.htm
As for long-term safety, seasonal flu vaccines do not have to have the same long-term safety studies that other drugs do; that is true. However, this is because they are needed urgently--manufacturers don't have as much time to go through all the same tests for vaccines that they do for other drugs (or other vaccines) in time to get a seasonal flu vaccine to the public. However, there have been no major reports of long-term seasonal flu effects, and the seasonal flu vaccine has been around for years.
Please make your judgements based on sound scientific information, not sensationalized media coverage. I can respect a decision made on good information.
As a student in the health sciences, it makes me very worried when people make decisions about their health that are based on irrelevant or false information. I feel it's my duty to share truthful information about these health questions so that everyone can read that info, judge it for themselves, and make a decision that way. For that reason, I recommend that everyone read the FDA link I posted above.
Here's an article from the FDA on H1N1 vaccine safety: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/ucm182290.htm
One on Gardasil safety, which is not really relevant to this debate but I'll post as well:
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/ucm179549.htm
Please consider the sources you get information from. There are many websites that try to sensationalize rare cases simply because creating a feeling of panic increases their website traffic and thus their profits from advertisers. The FDA is a government agency that exists to protect the public from unsafe medication and they work very hard to do so. The climate within the pharmaceutical industry (and I have worked in this industry) is very regulated and everything is documented and reported.
If you read good scientific information produced by the FDA, which exists solely to keep us safe, and still don't want to get the vaccine, that's fine for you, but please remember that if you get the disease, you can spread it. Spreading the disease will only make the worldwide situation worse. Widespread vaccination has made some diseases all but disappear in the US, which protects everyone, including those who don't have the money to get a vaccine or aren't in one of the target age groups.
The problem with most of the popular information about vaccines is that it relies heavily on rare cases or things that could be due to a number of factors in the patient's life. This is because people are all different and will respond differently to a drug. You may be the one in 100,000 that has an adverse reaction, that is true. However, the potential benefits of the H1N1 vaccine--not getting sick and missing work, not spreading the virus farther to extend the worldwide pandemic, not spreading the virus to children who are too young to be vaccinated, not spreading the virus to those who aren't on the recommended vaccination list--are great, and the risks are very low. The probability of a major adverse event is very low.
More info on vaccine safety:
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/ucm133806.htm
As for long-term safety, seasonal flu vaccines do not have to have the same long-term safety studies that other drugs do; that is true. However, this is because they are needed urgently--manufacturers don't have as much time to go through all the same tests for vaccines that they do for other drugs (or other vaccines) in time to get a seasonal flu vaccine to the public. However, there have been no major reports of long-term seasonal flu effects, and the seasonal flu vaccine has been around for years.
Please make your judgements based on sound scientific information, not sensationalized media coverage. I can respect a decision made on good information.