lizabeth332
Well-Known Member
SunnieBunnie Rabbitry wrote:
Oh my Gosh!!!! The little sable DOES have whitetoes!! i hadn't noticed that! wow cool,thanks. But how'd he come out a sable???
I know its not impossible, just weird.
In the picture of the dad, he looks chocolate, but i can see how that could be a faded blue in the wrong light...
so... DAD: aa B_ C_ (but couldn't be C or Chd if it threw a sable) dd E_ then the dutch/bkn gene stuff
MOM: aa B_ C (chl, ch, or c) Dd (threw a blue)E_ Enen...Du???
so one of the parents carries chl, but not both, because if both did it would be a seal, right? chlchl...
that baby is a sable, right?
~Sunshine
I went back and took a closer look at the pictures above...Funbunbun, am I correct if I say the toes on the front feet of the darkbaby look white (er, pink)? That in itself could be the Dutchmarkings you were looking for Liz, and obviously you wouldn't be ableto see any "dutch marking" difference on the broken baby.
As for the one that didn't make it - it was hard to tell fromthe picture if it was all white or if it was spotted or marked.
Oh my Gosh!!!! The little sable DOES have whitetoes!! i hadn't noticed that! wow cool,thanks. But how'd he come out a sable???
I know its not impossible, just weird.
In the picture of the dad, he looks chocolate, but i can see how that could be a faded blue in the wrong light...
so... DAD: aa B_ C_ (but couldn't be C or Chd if it threw a sable) dd E_ then the dutch/bkn gene stuff
MOM: aa B_ C (chl, ch, or c) Dd (threw a blue)E_ Enen...Du???
so one of the parents carries chl, but not both, because if both did it would be a seal, right? chlchl...
that baby is a sable, right?