Shuu wrote:
I agree. That's why I said a good home. I'm sure it'll be a longlong while before this will of Lissa's will be needed. In the meantime,she could attempt to find someone whom she knows will make a goodbunny-parent and so there will be no need for the euthanization option.
[/quote]
Shuu,
I hear that.
I agree - if she could find a good home for her babies,it would be a God Send. Certainly that's something that Lissa wouldprefer for her babies, as would all of us. The last thing any of uswants to think about is the ending of our babies lives.
I truly hope that it will be a long long time before a Will is needed, but there are no guarantees.
Speaking in the here and now, if she couldn't find a good home for themand if she and Jason were to die sooner rather than later, theirfamilies will know and honor their final wishes. If she couldn't find agood home - even after searching her soul and checking out therealistic possibilities, I don't think it's selfish to euthanize therabbit. In some cases, it is the lesser of the two evils.
The argument could be noted that it would be selfish to keep the rabbitalive at all costs - regardless of it's happiness, good care, stresslevels, etc.
Tucker would go into GI Stasis immediately. He's scared to death ofchange and emotional upset. If someone wasn't there to pick up on itright away and give him what he needed, he could (and I assure you,would) die a very slow, lonely, and painful death.
It is a personal choice and everyone has their own opinion/moralisticviewpoints on it. There is no right or wrong here. A question ofopinion was asked and we expressed our viewpoints.
To Each His Own.
Each person must decide on their own what they feel is best for theirrabbits and their situation. Knowing the members of this forum and howdeeply they love their charges, I have full confidence that owners willmake the best, most loving choice possible for their rabbits.
-Carolyn