Pipp
Well-Known Member
racerabbits wrote:
I did read it as saying they were NOT throw-away rabbits, I knew what you meant there. (I've corrected that as well for you).
We are saying the same thing when it comes to the rabbits being seized.
I appreciate your input on this. This kind of information is crucial. I will never make judgements without hearing all sides.
And I always leave room for the gray areas, these things are never black and white -- one side is right, one wrong. Truth and perspective are complex things and it takes a lot of detail to figure it all out.
sas
This is what I am saying. They went about this all wrong. IF the rabbits end up going out for adoption, for whatever reason...who is equipped to take on Wool Breed rabbits? They would all be sterlized at a great cost to the animal shelter. It would have been best to plan this out and look at all the angles.
I haven't said there is room for improvement with her rabbitry, just wanted to give both sides of a one sides news report.
racerabbits
Pipp wrote: I would have preferred to see warnings, attempts at monitoring the situation, initiating or requesting a herd reduction, citations requesting better grooming and firm, workable suggestions for enrichment, etc, before taking such drastic action.
I did read it as saying they were NOT throw-away rabbits, I knew what you meant there. (I've corrected that as well for you).
We are saying the same thing when it comes to the rabbits being seized.
I appreciate your input on this. This kind of information is crucial. I will never make judgements without hearing all sides.
And I always leave room for the gray areas, these things are never black and white -- one side is right, one wrong. Truth and perspective are complex things and it takes a lot of detail to figure it all out.
sas