It's gotta be stress combined with thesickness. So my question is: If you know you're rabbit is going to die(I knew Lenci wasn't going to make it), should you not go to the vetand let it die peacefully at home?
Hi (((Lissa))),
I've never lost a rabbit taking it to - or from - the vet's...at leastnot through any fault of the vet's or through stress. However, rabbitsare such fragile little creatures that there is always some riskinvolved. When I purchased Raph (my Elop I now have) it was a harddecision to make for me, because - even though I found 3 differentbreeders who were willing to ship a rabbit to me via plane - the stressinvolved in shipping a rabbit is very high. But I finally did opt forit, as I had no other means of buying an Elop, and Raph survived thetrip. (His current health problems are another matter altogether.) Andwhen I used to show rabbits eons ago, it was always a risk,transporting them to and from the shows. I did almost lose my bestPolish (and my baby!) at one of them...when we arrived at the show Iwas unloading their cages and saw Fiver flat out on his side, hisbreathing erratic, and his teeth clamped hard around the bars of hiscage...he was in shock. I covered his cage and put it in a quiet place,and thankfully, within about 20 minutes he recovered fully. But...for awhile there it could have gone either way for him.
To take a rabbit to a vet, esp. if it is ill, is risky because ofstress involved...but I believe that in having a sick rabbit, whenone's own methods aren't working at home, or if your own diagnosisisn't absolute, then it is much riskier for the rabbit to not seek aveterinarian's help.
About your question regarding taking a dying rabbit to the vet...Ithink if I knew without one bit of a doubt that my rabbit was going todie, and nothing could be done to intervene, then yes, I would keep mybun at home and keep him or her comfortable until the time came. But itis sometimes hard to know one way or the other, because many times arabbit can recover with treatment, depending upon the illness andseverity.
With one of my animals, Tiger (a cat, not a rabbit), I knew he wasdying. He had been diagnosed with cancer that was inoperable, so my vetasked if I wanted to have him put to sleep, or did I want to take himhome and let him pass on his own. I chose the latter, thinking (alongwith my vet) that Tiger would not live longer another day or two. Iwanted him to be as comfortable as possible, and to pass on his ownwith his buddies around. However, Tiger lived on for another week, andin that time he stopped eating and drinking. He couldn't walk, just layin his bed quietly. It finally reached a point where I had to make adecision...should I leave him to die naturally, or...was he suffering?He had become so thin and frail, and his quality of life was gone, yetstill he clung to life. I finally made the decision and took him backto the vet, where he was put to sleep. (That was the first time Iactually remained with a pet while he was being put down, and I have tosay, his passing was so peaceful...I absolutely don't regret thatdecision.)
So I think with such a question, the most important factor is whetheror not the animal is suffering...if it can be determined that theyaren't, then allowing them to cross over naturally at home would be myfirst choice. But if they are having a difficult time, then having theoption of a vet-assisted crossing is truly a godsend.