Yeah, I think everybody's on the same page here.
PETA was and is well organized and a formidable supporter of animals inmany respects, buttheir under-publicized true agenda ofeliminating animals as pets under the banner of 'animalrights'lost me a few years ago.
The final nail in the coffin for me was when an old gentleman showed upat their headquarters in tears with a pet bunny he could no longer carefor, they promised him they'dfind the bunny a home, then tookit in the back and euthanized the poor thing within minutes.
I'm surprised and disappointed the fraud charges didn'tstick. I was also hoping the trial would be more contentiousso thepublicity would once and for all make it clear whatthis organization is all about. PETA can afford thebest lawyers, though, I suspect this is how they wanted it to playout.
I do fear for the future of animal rights when PETA goes down,though. Animal activists have been overly abrasive, they'vegenerated a community of haters who are turning the tables and pushingthrough legislation to handcuff the activists.PETA, right or wrong, were at least strong enough in terms of fundingand support tocarry abig stick. Withoutthe support of pet owners, they won't have the clout, and there'snobody waiting in the wings to take over. The rest of the'industry', from what I've been seeing, fullof disorganized,combative, backbitingbleeding hearts (that partis agood thing)who are great for individual rescues but terriblefor lobbying efforts requiring a more reservedprofessionalism.
sas :soapbox